Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 2022 Sep 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326373

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are an undesired perioperative outcome. Recent studies have shown increases in hospital acquired infections during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The objective of this study was to evaluate postoperative SSIs in the COVID-19-era compared to a historical cohort at a large, multicenter, academic institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) inpatient surgical procedures between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. Patients from the COVID-19-era (March-December 2020) were compared and matched 1:1 with historical controls (2018/2019) utilizing the standardized infection ratio (SIR) to detect difference. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: During the study period, 29,904 patients underwent NHSN procedures at our institution. When patients from the matched cohort (2018/2019) were compared to the COVID-19-era cohort (2020), a decreased risk of SSI was observed following colorectal surgery (RR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.65, 1.37], P = .76), hysterectomy (RR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.39, 1.99], P = .75), and knee prothesis surgery (RR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.52, 1.74], P = .88), though not statistically significant. An increased risk of SSI was observed following hip prosthesis surgery (RR 1.09, 95% CI [0.68, 1.75], P = .72), though not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of SSI in patients who underwent NHSN inpatient surgical procedures in 2020 with perioperative COVID-19 precautions was not significantly different when compared to matched controls at our large, multicenter, academic institution.

2.
Journal of Dental Hygiene (Online) ; 95(3):18-24, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1904375

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has generated renewed interest in the potential transmission of viral contaminants via ultrasonic scaler-generated aerosols. The purpose of this study was to use controlled experimental conditions to quantify the range, direction, and concentration of aerosolized and splatter droplet spread across distances up to 106 inches from the source of the ultrasonic scaling procedure on a manikin patient head. Methods: A dental simulation unit (DSU) was used to facilitate ultrasonic instrumentation performed on a typodont located within a manikin patient head. A 9 x 9-foot section of white paper was placed on the floor directly beneath the DSU. White paper was also placed on the adjacent countertops for identification of possible spread. Methylene blue dye was mixed with reverse-osmosis (RO) water and placed in the reservoir of the ultrasonic scaler. Experimental tests were run with high-volume evacuation (HVE) and a with a saliva ejector. Photographs of the paper and droplets were taken and analyzed by computer software to identify all droplets captured on the paper. Results: Particle counts show that HVE use is associated with a reduction in total particle count for each zone evaluated, with the largest reduction seen in regions closest to the origin. Using HVE on the DSU demonstrated a 99% reduction in particles and 50% reduction in the range of particles. Conclusion: Dental health care providers should use HVE when generating aerosols during ultrasonic instrumentation procedures to reduce particle spread in health care settings.

3.
Nanomedicine ; 34: 102388, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1142161

ABSTRACT

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a devastating pulmonary disease with significant in-hospital mortality and is the leading cause of death in COVID-19 patients. Excessive leukocyte recruitment, unregulated inflammation, and resultant fibrosis contribute to poor ARDS outcomes. Nanoparticle technology with cerium oxide nanoparticles (CNP) offers a mechanism by which unstable therapeutics such as the anti-inflammatory microRNA-146a can be locally delivered to the injured lung without systemic uptake. In this study, we evaluated the potential of the radical scavenging CNP conjugated to microRNA-146a (termed CNP-miR146a) in preventing acute lung injury (ALI) following exposure to bleomycin. We have found that intratracheal delivery of CNP-miR146a increases pulmonary levels of miR146a without systemic increases, and prevents ALI by altering leukocyte recruitment, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, and decreasing collagen deposition, ultimately improving pulmonary biomechanics.


Subject(s)
Bleomycin/adverse effects , Cerium , Drug Delivery Systems , MicroRNAs , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , Animals , Bleomycin/pharmacology , COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/metabolism , Cerium/chemistry , Cerium/pharmacology , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Mice , MicroRNAs/chemistry , MicroRNAs/pharmacology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/chemically induced , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/genetics , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
4.
Respir Care ; 65(8): 1094-1103, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-680692

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is creating ventilator shortages in many countries that is sparking a conversation about placing multiple patients on a single ventilator. However, on March 26, 2020, six leading medical organizations released a joint statement warning clinicians that attempting this technique could lead to poor outcomes and high mortality. Nevertheless, hospitals around the United States and abroad are considering this technique out of desperation (eg, New York), but there is little data to guide their approach. The overall objective of this study is to utilize a computational model of mechanically ventilated lungs to assess how patient-specific lung mechanics and ventilator settings impact lung tidal volume (VT). METHODS: We developed a lumped-parameter computational model of multiple patients connected to a shared ventilator and validated it against a similar experimental study. We used this model to evaluate how patient-specific lung compliance and resistance would impact VT under 4 ventilator settings of pressure control level, PEEP, breathing frequency, and inspiratory:expiratory ratio. RESULTS: Our computational model predicts VT within 10% of experimental measurements. Using this model to perform a parametric study, we provide proof-of-concept for an algorithm to better match patients in different hypothetical scenarios of a single ventilator shared by > 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Assigning patients to preset ventilators based on their required level of support on the lower PEEP/higher [Formula: see text] scale of the National Institute of Health's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Network (ARDSNet), secondary to lung mechanics, could be used to overcome some of the legitimate concerns of placing multiple patients on a single ventilator. We emphasize that our results are currently based on a computational model that has not been validated against any preclinical or clinical data. Therefore, clinicians considering this approach should not look to our study as an exact estimate of predicted patient VT values.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Positive-Pressure Respiration/instrumentation , Ventilators, Mechanical/supply & distribution , Algorithms , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Computer Simulation , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Proof of Concept Study , Respiratory Mechanics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL